I love the look and the workflow and that it works seamlessly with my equipment. I love DT, it's hugely powerful and has an enormous amount of modules. I got used to DT over RT initially because I preferred the interface and it was closer to LR so I could better profit from the wealth of information out there. Especially the famous clarity tool in LR doesn't exist in DT as such, and sliders will have different values and/or be called differently although they may do the same. If you try to achieve a certain effect and you follow the tutorials you find but the results aren't there, you never know if your picture isn't good enough, you're too dumb, the tutorial is dumb or if it's down to differences in the software. One thing that is almost worth paying for Lightroom is that every effing tutorial out there, be it YouTube, books or random websites, is based on Lightroom. Now, while Photoshop has the nicer interface and some tools are better integrated, GIMP's menus and workflow seem much more logical and natural to me and I prefer it now. I grew up on Photoshop and hated GIMP's interface, but eventually I became too lazy to reboot into Windows and got used to GIMP. Just as with Photoshop and GIMP, there is a huge habit aspect to it. Personally I use Darktable on Linux and am quite happy with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |